------------------------------ Bundle: 553 Archive-Message-Number: 6958 Date: Mon, 14 Mar 94 22:09:06 CST From: [-- REDACTED --] (David Johnson) Subject: Looking for 'Background' (vs. 'Rules') Devotees Gentlesophonts: Are there any folks out there who are more interested in campaign background rather than rules and such? TML discussions of late seem to be overwhelmed with questions and debates over what are, IMHO, minutia. Here's a sampling of messages since the beginning of March: Msgs 'Rules' Msgs 'Background' Msgs Other Msgs 6892-6895 1 2 1 6896-6899 1 0 3 6900-6908 4 2 3 6909-6917 5 0 4 6918-6923 4 0 2 6924-6926 2 0 1 6927-6932 2 0 4 6933-6935 2 0 1 6936-6939 3 0 1 6940-6946 3 1 3 6947-6947 1 0 0 6948-6949 1 0 1 6950-6956 2 0 5 Totals 30 5 29 (`Other Msgs' includes msgs about the TML, Traveller products, and other games like 2300AD.) I've never been one to be too concerned with details of the rules. (I just hold to the First Rule of Role Playing: If the Rules Don't Work the Way You'd Like - Change Them - It's Just a Game.). I'm more concerned with the `Big Picture'. Is there anyone else who thinks discussions about weapon penetration, craft design, and planetary science is a little moot in a two-dimensional universe? (I'm not trying to hassle you `rules junkies' - I'm just looking for some like-minded-souls of my own.) In an effort to start a `Background' discussion, here's a question: What is there to recommend TNE (vs. MT or CT) from a `background' point of view? Forget the new rules and such, is the new campaign an improvement over the ante-Rebellion, Rebellion and Hard Times eras? (For the sake of discussion let's ignore the hard, cold reality that TNE is the only campaign being supported officially.) Cordially, David Johnson ------------------------------