pennausamike
05-31-2020
17:50 UT
|
Hi David: I gave your reasoned response considerable thought, and I
guess my short reply is that every author is entitled to a klunker or
two. And for me, "Edge of the Knife" is one of Piper's klunkers, made
possible by the author's personal flaw, rather than good story telling.
As
far as your point about the twist, you're right. Without the
commitment thing, there is no twist, and the story becomes more like
"When In The Course..."; a straight forward telling of interesting
events. Which isn't as big a problem for me as it is for many readers.
There are a number of authors (none of whom I can dredge up from my
memory at the moment) whose careers are built on recounting tales of
life. Maybe no twists; but problems solved or lessons learned kind of
thing. That's how I've always enjoyed WItC, and that is how I would
have liked EotK if Chalmers hadn't made such a bonehead move. From a
story telling viewpoint, maybe it would have made more sense for
Chalmers to be buried away in a civilian contractor office in a basement
somewhere, serving as a flesh-and-blood Merlin to the founders of the
1st Federation.
|
Dave Eden
05-31-2020
04:21 UT
|
Good insights, guys. I often think about how Beam could've saved himself so many ways. But he did things his own way.
Thanks to the recipe John Carr shares in his book, I have a tradition of having a katinka on Saturday in honour of Beam.
|
David "PiperFan" Johnson
05-31-2020
00:43 UT
|
~ Mike "pennausamike" McGuirk wrote:
> So of course the Doctor signs the papers to ship him off > to the funny farm. WAIT, WHAT?! (Needle slides > across the record right here!) Why in the name of Dralm > would he DO that? And I literally mean that; why would > Chalmers see commitment as his ticket to safety?
I
have also always found this to be an absurd choice but putting aside
the fact that it gives a dramatic twist to the end to the yarn--which
may have been what an editor wanted--I've often wondered if this was
also Beam signalling that perhaps Chalmers wasn't as sane as Chalmers
believed he was after all.
I mean it's clear that throughout the
yarn his "memories of the future" are getting the best of him, whether
it's him believing that he wrote down "remembered future" details that
he cannot subsequently find or him blathering in class again even after
he realized he needed to be more careful about not doing so or
recklessly rambling on to Pottgeiter even later in the yarn.
We
believe Chalmers' "future memories" because we've read the other
Terrohuman Future History yarns but the internal evidence in "Edge"
itself suggests Chalmers is at best an unreliable narrator. It's
possible both that his "future memories" are accurate ~and~ that he is,
nevertheless, losing his mind (perhaps driven to madness by these very
"memories of the future").
> I believe the answer lies in the psychology behind Piper's > decision to quit the PRR when the Altoona shops got slow. > H. Beam Piper may have only been a night watchman, but > he worked in a Union shop, and his employment would > have been determined by seniority. He would have had > to bump his way through various positions as people were > laid off. A pain to be sure, but it would have meant a > steady paycheck, probably some version of healthcare, > however minimal-some pension, and if carried to > termination, an earned right to unemployment > compensation. WELL! H. Beam Piper wasn't going to > stand for all that inconvenience and indignity, no sir. > He would grab the bull by the horns and handle it > RIGHT NOW! By quitting.
That's an interesting perspective.
I
agree Beam "chose . . . poorly" and that his choices were driven, in
part, by his peculiar "self-reliant" philosophy but whether or not a
similar sort of dynamic is how he was writing Chalmers, intentionally or
unintentionally, is a good question.
I'd like to believe that
Beam was writing a better story, along the lines I've suggested above
(and perhaps within the editorial constraints of the story sale) but you
may have it right here.
That would make the sad tale of Beam's life even a bit more sad.
> These are two instances, one real and one fictional, where > Piper's self-reliant man crosses over into bad decisions > based on hubris or pride-driven laziness ("I'm too good to > be bothered with all that rigmarole) and the self-reliant man > hands himself over to the whims and actions of others. > Piper's better (read, my favorite) characters don't make such > life-destroying choices, and the stories are better for it.
This
is true too, so wouldn't that tend to suggest that Beam was a more
self-aware and better-skilled writer than the writer who would write
"Edge" the way you've suggested? Don't these many other examples suggest
that perhaps Beam was doing something intentional in the way he wrote
Chalmers besides simply channeling his own inner psychic dysfunction?
I suppose we'll never know but I'd like to think so.
Cheers,
David -- "There
had been the time he'd mentioned the secession of Canada from the
British Commonwealth. . . ."- Edward Chalmers (H. Beam Piper), "The Edge
of the Knife" ~
|
pennausamike
05-30-2020
07:26 UT
|
I'm in the middle of re-reading my Piper collection for the umpteenth
time; something I probably do every two to three years. Sometimes I
read everything, other times just my favorites. This time I'm reading
everything I have, including reading through the two Piper biographies
written by John Carr. It is funny (to me, at least) how my favorite
Piper stories mirror my favorite attributes of Piper the man, and my
least favorite stories tend to mirror Piper's personal characteristics
that I find the most flawed or least admirable. Which brings me to the
most flawed character I think Piper ever wrote; or maybe to say it
better, the character who makes the most flawed, life-changing decision
Piper ever wrote. I'm speaking of Professor Edward Chalmers of "The
Edge of the Knife". I think Chalmers' decision to have himself
committed as insane was every bit as poor a piece of decision making as
Piper's choice to just up and quit the Pennsylvania Railroad rather than
let the layoffs and closings proceed naturally. Although we don't see
the results of Chalmers' choice play out in the story, I think a
reasonable assumption of how it played out versus how it could have been
(if Chalmers simply wasn't committed) is easy to extrapolate. In both
the story and in Piper's real life, I feel the protagonists (Piper and
Chalmers) each thought he was making some bold choice to be the master
of his own destiny, when in fact, both Piper and Chalmers blindly
relinquished control of their own lives with a choice that subordinated
them to the will of others.
In "The Edge of the Knife" (I'm not
summarizing the whole story, assuming people on the Piper forum already
know it) future-seeing Professor Chalmers is being interviewed by the
state psychiatrist for possible commitment as insane. Because Chalmers
is actually able to see the future and also is actually sane, he is on
the cusp of being declared sane when he "sees" that in the near future
the college he teaches at will be destroyed in the upcoming war he
envisions, but the area around the mental hospital he will be sent to if
he is judged insane will survive. "Ha Ha Ha!" he laughs manically,
"you can't commit me because I'm blah, blah, blah!" So of course the
Doctor signs the papers to ship him off to the funny farm. WAIT, WHAT?!
(Needle slides across the record right here!) Why in the name of
Dralm would he DO that? And I literally mean that; why would Chalmers
see commitment as his ticket to safety? (No, I don’t believe it was to
stay safe from the intelligence officer, because I believe Chalmers
successfully placated him in the same way he did the state
psychiatrist.) I believe the answer lies in the psychology behind
Piper's decision to quit the PRR when the Altoona shops got slow. H.
Beam Piper may have only been a night watchman, but he worked in a Union
shop, and his employment would have been determined by seniority. He
would have had to bump his way through various positions as people were
laid off. A pain to be sure, but it would have meant a steady paycheck,
probably some version of healthcare, however minimal-some pension, and
if carried to termination, an earned right to unemployment compensation.
WELL! H. Beam Piper wasn't going to stand for all that inconvenience
and indignity, no sir. He would grab the bull by the horns and handle
it RIGHT NOW! By quitting. And likewise, Professor Chalmers couldn't
be bothered with proving his sanity, keeping his job, squaring away his
personal belongings, looking for a place to live in the vicinity of
Northern State Mental Hospital, getting time off work and then moving to
and settling in to a new area. No sir; he'd get himself trucked right
up there by the men in white coats RIGHT NOW! He then warns his friend
Max of the impending disaster, so now poor old fuzzy-thinking Max is the
one who has to get Chalmers' notes and belongings collected and move up
to the Northern State area. Sorry, but I don't think either Piper's or
Chalmers' decision was a particularly wise one.
To start with
Professor Chalmers, he asks the Doctor if he can take his notes and work
on them, and the Doctor agrees. But how do you think that's REALLY
going to work out? My opinion is that Chalmers will be tormented and
distracted in his attempts to continue recording his future history.
Orderlies will keep him from working on them at the least (meal time,
lights out, etc) and taunt him and take his notes at worst. And
psychiatric doctors will examine his "work" and then try to medicate and
shock him until his "delusions" go away. It is far more likely that
Chalmers' brain would be turned to mush, than it is that he would be
seen as a seer who should be released, once the wars unfold as he
predicted. How much better off he would have been if he had maintained
his freedom to choose his own path. Although different in some ways,
the circumstances Piper thrust himself into by his decision to quit the
PRR were similar in that they put him in the subordinate position to
those around him. Although the effects of no-reliable income weren't
immediate, Piper eventually saw his opportunities and independence
whittled down to near-nothing. He lost authority to his equally
strong-willed wife and he turned writing from an avocation and source of
pride to a vocation from which he could not eke out a living wage. The
sad part is, the Altoona shops never closed. Part of their work was
sent to Juniata PA, but in the years leading up to even today, the
Altoona shops were reinvented a number of times, and still employ 1,100
people. Poor Beam; if only he had exercised a bit more patience, he
could have possibly worked his way into small but steady income to carry
him between stories.
These are two instances, one real and one
fictional, where Piper's self-reliant man crosses over into bad
decisions based on hubris or pride-driven laziness ("I'm too good to be
bothered with all that rigmarole) and the self-reliant man hands himself
over to the whims and actions of others. Piper's better (read, my
favorite) characters don't make such life-destroying choices, and the
stories are better for it.
|
Gordon Johansen
05-24-2020
17:42 UT
|
What a fun post from Jon. I had forgotten that he had gone through that. It certainly looks like he beat the curse.
|
David "PiperFan" Johnson
05-23-2020
17:09 UT
|
~ From the Archives: "Carr: Are They Telling Me I'm On The Wrong Time-Line?"
Below,
another message to the old PIPER-L mailing list, from way back in May
2001, in which John recounts what may be a bit of interference from his
favorite Paratimer:
--- SOMETIMES THEY CALL ME JOHN FORD, SOMETIMES THEY CALL ME JOHN F. LAST, AND SOMETIMES THEY EVEN CALL ME JOHN F. CARR!
Let me preface this post with a little backstory. On April 14, 1998 I had open-heart surgery, for a 'routine' valve replacement. It wasn't un-expected: I was born with a congenital heart defect, a damaged heart valve. Through luck, determination not to have my chest ripped apart, and a healthy life style, I managed to delay this operation for about 34 years beyond my original cardiologist's prediction in 1954 of open-heart surgery in early 60s! To make a long story short, the operation was a success and when I came out of anesthesia and was walked (they don't coddle heart patients these days!) into the post-op room, I was greeted by Dr. Yan, head of my 4-surgeon surgical team. His first words were: "You very lucky. We found aortic aneurysm: you had between 2 seconds and 2 weeks to live. If your aneurysm would have blown out, we could not have saved you on the table. Very lucky man."
Well, I don't need to belabor the point to tell you that I've felt VERY lucky ever since -- my wife calls me her "Walking Miracle." The facts that I hadn't seen a cardiologist (or any other doctor) for 16 years before going to Dr. Ryman, that I hadn't had health insurance at any time in the previous 33 years (since I left my parent's home!), and that the job I had with Coast Federal Bank only lasted 4 months beyond my health insurance qualification period of 90 days (Coast was merged in March '98 with Home Saving/then WAMA -- as Washington Mutual Bank is know unaffectionately here on the Westcoast by anyone who's had to deal with the bastards!) gives you an idea of just how many odds I beat. If I did this well on a roulette table in Vegas I'd own the whole town before I left!
On top of this, I felt in wonderful shape -- no symptoms of the failing heart I was told by my doctors I would soon have to deal with in a year or two, leading to congestive heart failure. The fact that is I'm one stubborn S.O.B. when it comes to not getting myself filleted, well, you get the picture. If Dr. Ryman wasn't equally pig-headed, I'd probably not be here! It was when she told me "get this operation now, or you'll need a transplant in a year-and-a-half, that convinced me to 'face reality,' so to speak.
I talked, bullied my way out of the hospital in 4 days -- my wife still calls this my 'Exorcist' period! -- and healed at home in the comfort of my own bed. Not having taken drugs all my life -- I sometimes think I was the only straight rock musician in the 1960s, and certainly the only one who remembers it all! Well, I had a very bad reaction to the pain medication, which I didn't even need thanks to a very high pain threshold -- and got a bit snippy in the hospital, as my wife tells it. (Actually, she puts it a little coarser, but we won't go into that!) Victoria finally convinced the nurses I didn't need the pain pills and they gladly let me leave early!
The doctors don't like you to do much for the first 3 months after open-heart surgery (especially driving cars, since upon impact with the steering wheel bad things happen and chest cavities have been know to unexpectedly and unhappily open up -- something they don't talk about! My wife asks a lot of questions so I got in on this little bit of information, I'd rather not have known.) so I had a LOT of time to think over my close call with the grim reaper and life in general.
Needless to say, my overall mood was very good. However, after 25 years of studying Beam Piper and writing several novels in Paratime, it couldn't help but think about Beam's own death and the Piper curse, as some people call it -- for example, my friend Bill Tuning died less than a year after the publication of "Fuzzy Bones." My question was: how did I escape, or did I?
Are there time-lines where John F. Carr died sometime in April 1998...? This is why, to this day, I celebrate my Re-Birthday on May 1, which is exactly 2 weeks from my surgery and my longest possible lifespan after April 14, 1998. Don't worry, I don't really dwell on it: it's just a day for my wife and I to appreciate the fact that I'm in actuality a walking poster child for Miracles of the Week! (Maybe I ought to do a television treatment -- nah, just kidding!) No presents: we just go out for a nice dinner and enjoy our time together. My natal birthday is Christmas so it's not much of a birthday, even if my initials are JC... Let's not even go there.
No religious conversions, no new truth 'to bring back from the void' -- just a better appreciation for life and how short it can be, for any of us.
Now, what brought all this on -- besides my Re-Birthday about a week and a half ago -- is the latest issue of 'Science Fiction Chronicle' where they review "Kalvan Kingmaker" in Don D'Ammassa's Critical Mass: Book Reviews, P-36. The good news is KK is the lead review and it's a positive review. The bad news is they changed my name to John Ford about halfway through the review -- I won't even bother to dwell on the fact that they dropped the last half of the Pequod address and included my e-mail address instead of the website! I know Don and I suspect it was the meddling that happens to good magazines when you try to shorten a piece so that it fits on the page and don't always pay attention to what gets cut.
I probably wouldn't have paid the name change much mind had Ace not also changed my name, on the Copyright page of "The Complete Paratime," from John F. Carr to John F. Last -- see what I mean, it's like a message.
Maybe Verkan's behind all this and letting me know that Beam wasn't just writing fiction! John Ford, the director, has been dead for years and John F. Last -- well that's obvious.
So maybe this is the Fourth Level, Europo-American, John Carr Time-Line and on all the other Europo-American time-lines fate and/or the Paratime Police caught up with me and I'm moldering in a box six feet underground --
Now hear this Verkan, wherever you are, I'm onto you and I'm not taking the hint -- I'm going to continue writing Paratime yarns. Your agents dispatched Beam, Bill and Richard Meredith -- I just want you to know that I'm not going quietly into the night. I know you're behind the Ace Piper re-issue ban and all the saucer sightings in the US. I don't know about the cattle mutilations, but we're still investigating... This is one time-line -- maybe the root Europo-American time-line, where you're not going to get away with it!
Don't take this too seriously, this is just good fun. I woke up this morning and this entire post blossomed in my mind. However, sometimes late at night, after writing all evening, like last night -- when scenes and visions of Aryan-Transpacific and First Level drop into my mind like I'm patched into a 'broadcast' from another world, I sometimes just wonder if maybe Beam wasn't onto something...
John F. Carr Paratime Chronicler -----
John's original message is available here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080310041446...r-l&T=0&F=&S=&P=663
Cheers,
David -- "Unsolved
mysteries are just as good as explanations, as long as they're
mysterious within a normal framework." - Verkan Vall, ~Lord Kalvan of
Otherwhen~ ~
|
David Sooby
05-01-2020
01:24 UT
|
David Johnson wrote: > ...the explanation for why Merlin can only be "spoken to" by specialists... I
submit it would be quite dangerous to give Merlin a method of
interacting with normal people with a speech synthesizer and speech
input. Proper inputs to Merlin must be written, or phrased, in strict
rules adhering to formal logic, and the average person is neither
trained in that nor thinks that way. We computer programmers have a
saying: "Garbage in, garbage out." In other words, if the data fed into
the computer program is erroneous or is nonsense, then the output will
be too. Someone who wasn't a trained computer specialist who asked
Merlin a question that wasn't phrased precisely correct might result in
an answer which appeared to be reasonable, but which was completely
wrong. Not dangerous for Merlin, but dangerous for anyone acting on such an analysis or answer! Edited 05-01-2020 05:56
|
|
|